[Movie Review] ‘Rings’ is a mystery movie trying to be a horror film

"Rings" (United International Pictures)
"Rings" (United International Pictures)
"Rings" (United International Pictures)
“Rings” (United International Pictures)

Should you watch this if it’s free? Okay.

Should you watch it at weekday movie ticket prices? No.

Score: 2.0/5

Secret ending? No. 

Running time: 102 minutes (~1.75 minutes) 

Rings - UIP00010

“Rings” is an American supernatural horror film that’s the third in the “Ring” franchise, which is based on the Japanese horror novel series of the same title.

“Rings” sees the curse of Samara Morgan (more famously known as Sadako in the Japanese version) re-emerging when a college professor discovers her cursed video tape and ends conducting experiments with students on it. They soon discover that there seems to be another video within the original cursed video, which leads them to discovering more about Samara’s past.

“Rings” is directed by F. Javier Gutiérrez, with a story and screenplay by David Loucka Jacob and Aaron Estes. Akiva Goldsman is also credited for the screenplay. It stars Matilda Lutz (Julia), Alex Roe (Holt Anthony), Johnny Galecki (Gabriel Brown), Vincent D’Onofrio (Galen Burke), Aimee Teegarden (Skye Johnston), and Bonnie Morgan (Samara Morgan). It is rated PG-13.

"Rings" (United International Pictures)
“Rings” (United International Pictures)

Fun fact about the American version of the “Ring” franchise — the actress who has played Samara Morgan for two films (“Rings” and “Ring Two”), Bonnie Morgan, shares the same surname as the monstrous character she plays. Not only that, she’s also a contortionist, which helps explain how they manage to get Samara Morgan to move like Kayako from the “Ju-On” franchise. Beyond that, there’s very little that’s fresh about this instalment of the “Ring” franchise — it’s even reminiscent of story structure of the original.

"Rings" (United International Pictures)
“Rings” (United International Pictures)

 

Highlights

Integration of modern technology 

The problem with the original concept of “Ring” is that it hasn’t aged well, since the curse is spread by a video tape. Fortunately, “Rings” addresses this issue by showing just how easy it is to copy and analyse the contents of the video. In fact, that eventually becomes a key element of the climax. There’s also the issue of the copious number of screens we have these days, which is also skilfully made use of in the film.

"Rings" (United International Pictures)
“Rings” (United International Pictures)

Letdowns

What you see is what you get

You see Samara Morgan very early in the film. In fact, you see exactly what she looks like. This reduces the scare factor of the film since supernatural horror is highly dependent on the fear of the unknown. Of course, most people already know what Samara Morgan looks like, and it’s plastered all over the posters too. Still, some element of surprise would have helped to elevate the frights in the film.

"Rings" (United International Pictures)
“Rings” (United International Pictures)

Too many jump scares

There are just too many moments where the film suddenly quadruples its volume and shoves a random close-up in your face, all in the name of scaring you. It’s an unexpected shock that quickly evaporates once you realise there’s nothing out of the ordinary in that scene. Once it happens for the third time, you start wondering why the film has to resort to such cheap tricks to qualify as a horror film.

"Rings" (United International Pictures)
“Rings” (United International Pictures)

More mystery than horror

Perhaps the most critical issue of all is that “Rings” just isn’t scary. It’s more of a mystery, an adventure where the protagonists learn more about the dark secret behind Samara Morgan and the small town that she came from. There’s a fairly impressive revelation at the end of the film that serves as a decent twist to an otherwise straightforward tale. But this doesn’t make it a horror film. It’s more of a murder mystery, and it would have fared better if it were presented as such.

"Rings" (United International Pictures)
“Rings” (United International Pictures)

 

Plot problems

There are so many issues with the story. Are we supposed to sympathise with Samara? The film wants us to, yet it changes its mind abruptly at the end. Does Samara’s power have any limitations? The film establishes that she’s unable to exert her will in certain situations, but that restriction is arbitrarily removed when it’s convenient. Samara is shown to be able to write in English, so why doesn’t she just explain everything? Horror films aren’t meant to make sense, true, but “Rings” takes this to the extreme.

"Rings" (United International Pictures)
“Rings” (United International Pictures)

“Rings” would have been a better mystery film than a horror one.

“Rings” opens in cinemas:
– 23 February, 2017 (Singapore)
– 9 February, 2017 (Malaysia)
– 22 February, 2017 (Philippines)

"Rings" (United International Pictures)
“Rings” (United International Pictures)

This review was written for and first published on Yahoo Singapore.

Marcus Goh is a Singapore television scriptwriter, having written for Police & Thief, Incredible Tales, Crimewatch, and Point of Entry. He’s also a Transformers enthusiast and avid pop culture scholar. You can find him on social media as Optimarcus and on his site.

If you liked the article, follow me on Facebook and Twitter for more (presumably) good updates!

To get in touch with me, send an email!

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*