[Movie Review] Dawn of the Planet of the Apes has apes that are a draw and a flaw

Caesar (Andy Serkis) addresses the apes. (Yahoo Movies Singapore)
Caesar (Andy Serkis) addresses the apes. (Yahoo Movies Singapore)

Should you watch this in 3D? No, the effects are distracting.

Should you watch this at weekend movie ticket prices? No.

Should you watch this at weekday movie ticket prices? If you like the Planet of the Apes franchise.

Secret ending? No.

Running time: 131 minutes (~2 hours)

“Dawn of the Planet of the Apes” is a science fiction film which takes place on a post apocalyptic Earth, which has been overrun by intelligent apes. It is the second in the newly rebooted “Planet of the Apes” franchise. It focuses on the efforts on a group of survivors to make contact with the rest of the world, all while trying to maintain a fragile peace with a nearby group of apes. It stars James Clarke (Malcolm), Andy Serkis (Caesar), Toby Kebbell (Koba), Gary Oldman (Dreyfus), and Keri Russell (Ellie).

The prospect of CGI apes might seem like they’re unrelatable characters, but the film does manage to stir genuine emotion in its audiences for the ape protagonists. One thing’s for sure – skip the 3D effects. They amount to nothing more than extras walking past the main characters as they talk, or certain random bits of scenery, and it jolts you out of your suspension of disbelief in what is already an improbable premise.

Malcolm (Jason Clarke) meets Caesar (Andy Serkis).  (Yahoo Movies Singapore)
Malcolm (Jason Clarke) meets Caesar (Andy Serkis). (Yahoo Movies Singapore)

So what’s great about “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes?”

Caesar’s humanisation

The protagonist of the apes garners our empathy in a way that none of the live, human actors can. Which is to be expected – after all, he is the central character for the franchise (thus far). What is unexpected, though, is the level with which he makes you feel pity and admiration for him. Caesar is as human as any of the other human characters, which is echoed when he realises how much the apes have become like humans.

Apes vs humans battles

It’s a spectacular set piece which tops off the movie, featuring an all out battle between the apes and the humans. Apes with machine guns attack and massacre the humans, who afford only a paltry distraction at best. It takes place at night, and it instills you with a genuine fear of the apes and shows you just how deadly they are.

Koba (Toby Kebbell) wields a human weapon. (Yahoo Movies Singapore)
Koba (Toby Kebbell) wields a human weapon. (Yahoo Movies Singapore)

However, several flaws creep in that prevent the movie from connecting with us fully.

The characterisation of the apes as a whole

It’s confusing. Do we like or dislike them? Do we sympathise with their cause or hope that the humans win? Are they the villains or the victims of the piece? The movie vacillates between showing them in tender moments of vulnerability, to them revelling in the destruction of all humans. It’s one thing to give a well-rounded view of them, but the way they’re portrayed makes the apes look like a group of schizophrenic antagonists.

The heavy handed war metaphors

From the middle of Act One onwards, the movie bludgeons you with one straightforward message – peace is good, war is bad. It continues to slap you in the face with this theme again and again, whether it be through grandiose speeches from the apes and humans, or solemn scenes between characters just discussing this theme. There’s no subtlety to this message.

The apes look alike – too alike

In group scenes, Caesar is indistinguishable from the other apes. And that’s a problem, because the other ape characters have distinctive features, whether it be the scars on River (Caesar’s son), the ugliness of Koba, or how Maurice is just a different species altogether. This makes it difficult to locate Caesar sometimes, which again takes you out of the story of the movie.

Too much ape sign language

The apes occasionally speak in sign language and spoken English. It’s meant to signify their progression and evolution towards a spoken language, but having to read subtitles adds another layer of distraction on top of the already distracting 3D effects. Just one or two displays would have been enough to drive home the point, but the movie insists on using it all the way until the Act Three.

Malcolm (Jason Clarke) negotiates with the apes.  (Yahoo Movies Singapore)
Malcolm (Jason Clarke) negotiates with the apes. (Yahoo Movies Singapore)

The apes are both the greatest asset and the greatest flaw of the “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes.” Which is understandable, given that is the core premise of the film. It’s not a bad movie to watch, but there are other films that are more worthy of your time.

Dawn of the Planet of the Apes opens in cinemas 10 July 2014 (Thursday).

This review was also published on Yahoo Movies Singapore.

2 Comments

  1. Of course we like the apes, who else would we like? Certainly not the boring humans. The apes are the main characters and the reason why everyone went to see it. We sympathize and empathize with all of them, not just Caesar. A lot of the people I seen talk about the film, got emotional over seeing the apes killed and hurt. The apes thought that their king was killed by humans, so of course they’re gonna revile in the destruction of the species that previously enslaved, abused, neglected and killed them before their revolution. And then to come back after ten years of living peacefully and disrupt their lives. You sound seriously ignorant. And stop saying “us” like when you say “However, several flaws creep in that prevent the movie from connecting with us fully.” Uh no, speak for yourself, because you’re one of the few idiots who don’t love it, most people do.

  2. You seriously sound like a little nitpicking bitch and very stupid. Caesar isn’t distinguishable, are you fucking serious you?! Caesar is the MOST distinctive looking one you fucking idiot!!!! Get your eyes checked you mental defective. Is that little bit of reading of a few subtitles too hard for you little buddy? There are no heavy handed war metaphors, they mentioned war and peace very few times, and the whole selling point was the war between apes and humans. The things that you claim are flaws are not flaws at all, instead they’re nothing but a bunch of nitpicking bullshit that you pulled out of your ass attempting to discredit the brilliance of this film. But you’re wrong, ignorant, and don’t know what you’re talking among other things.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*